Saturday, May 16, 2020

Corporate Learning In Perspective

With Disruption being the new given and change being nothing but a truly ubiquitous phenomenon today, how do organizations survive the emerging landscape? We had an interesting discussion at the IIM Bangalore Future of Learning Summit, 2020 just a while ago before the world shifted into a mode where everyone is fighting the same problem in a lockdown mode.

Many challenges across six different dimensions were discussed during the panel discussion at IIM Bangalore. I had the privilege to moderate the discussion with my colleagues from the industry.

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Simple Framework To Understand Competency Utilization

In a earlier post I had spoken about competency utilization.   We looked at what drives competency utilization.  Now here is a framework to understand the concept in more detail. You need to focus on substantive issues that are specific to the organization context and cannot find a generic solution that will work for you.  That is the reason why so many companies that went in search of a solution to their problems by adopting a competency based HR framework did not succeed.  Here is a simple way to view it.

When we hire people with required competencies we are making an assumption that they will deliver superior performance.   This is however independent of the context.   There are three aspects we need to consider.   First we can assume that since you hired a person with the competencies there is one aspect "CAN DO" that is taken care of.  He / She will be able to deliver the capabilities that have been considered in the hiring decision.   



The more important aspect is that if the person "CAN DO"  then is it necessary for him or her to actually deliver. The response to that is decided by two other aspects of competency which are "CHOOSE TO DO" and "ALLOWED TO DO".    

CHOOSE TO DO is all about motivation. A person who can do may chose not to do.  Simple enought.  If that is the case then the quest for superior performance remains so. 

A person CAN DO, may CHOOSE TO DO but is not ALLOWED TO DO.  Barriers in performance, Assigning to the wrong role,  not recognizing and providing the required resources are all reasons for the failure to perform inspite of the capacity and motivation.

So whether a person actually utilizes what he or she was hired for is something which is context specific and needs to be viewed in such a manner.

In hindsight it is all simple but very important to understand and address the same in competency system design.  When I first designed and implemented a competency based HR system including a framework and enterprise wide portal at TCS it was exactly based on the premises above.  This emerged from my research work on competencies.   

There were several dimensions to this issue. To obtain a more detailed view of the framework and understand various dimensions you can register your email ID to receive updates.  All those who register by 30 Jun 2014 will receive a free copy of the detailed write up. Just fill in your email ID in the Get Blog on Email Text Box on the right pane of this page (Below Popular Posts) and Click on Submit.



Sunday, September 22, 2019

SEEING THE UNSEEN: REALIZING ONES POTENTIAL

A young man was listening to a discourse by a wise old man, and there was an interesting moment when the old man was concluding his talk and said something with a smile and twinkle in his eyes. "I was at Samathpur once a few years ago and, all I did was sit on the river bank and sell river water. These are the ways of the world," he concluded. Not a word after that and the talk ended.
The young man pondered what was the relevance of what the old man said at the end. It did not strike him for some time, and later, he went home and was getting ready to go to bed. His cat Billu came over, and they started a conversation.

Curious Cat: What makes you look so thoughtful today
Young Man: Wondering what the wise sage said. He then narrated the story.
Curious Cat: Can you imagine you were sitting there when the wise man was selling water from the river
Young Man: Of course, I am just doing that now. Yes it's green It's so pleasant and the water is so sweet
Curious Cat: And what are you doing?
Young Man: Am thinking of the hard work ahead the next day and enjoying the sweet water I just bought and anticipating a good nights sleep
Curious Cat: Yes Master. You were so busy buying and drinking water that you failed to see the river yourself.

Many a time we are like the young man. So busy doing things, working hard and toiling, laboring the days and nights without seeing the obvious opportunity that lies in front of our eyes and like the young man paying for the water that lay in front of our eyes. Now go ahead and reflect how many such pots did we buy from others selling us river water.

One needs to step back and see what are all the opportunities that were let go because and understand how to spot those opportunities to realize the potential we have within. The world will be a more fruitful face if we are able to uncover these visible but yet unseen opportunities that we let go in our journey. Spotting opportunities is the first step towards realizing potential. More on how this can be done in my next post

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Manage Understanding, Not Work, Not Efforts: Leadership Lesson

There is a beautiful story called "Parable of the Oranges" by Randall Ridd, who is a second counselor in the Young Men General Presidency. I stumbled across his story recently, and it resonated very well into how managers should work through with their teams to get more harmonious performance, more engaging ways of looking at their work, and more stimulation to see how change can make a difference in their lives at work.


There was a young man, let's call him Santhosh, who had ambitions to work for a great well know organization. After a tortuous round of selection, he made it as a trainee into the organization. Then he turned his ambition to his next goal—a supervisor position that would afford him even greater prestige and more pay and perks. He worked very hard, competed for his tasks on time, delivered on every goal the numbers he was challenged with. He came in early some mornings and stayed late so the bosses would see him putting in long hours.

When in a few years a position for supervisor came up he was shocked his name was not considered and another colleague who joined just six months ago was chosen. He went up to the manager with a feeling of being a victim of the system that did not recognize his good work.

He wanted to know why he was not promoted even though he worked so hard. He felt he was a victim of the system, a victim of situational context, and receiver of the raw end of the deal.

The manager said, “I will not give you an answer but help you find one. If you don't mind, would you go to the store and buy some oranges? My wife needs them.

Santhosh agreed and went to the store. When he returned, the manager asked, “What kind of oranges did you buy?”

“I don’t know,” said Santhosh. “You just said to buy oranges, and these are oranges. Here they are.” “How much did they cost?” the manager asked.

“Well, I’m not sure,” was the reply. “You gave me 100 Rupees. I have the receipt and the exact change.

“Thank you,” said the manager. “Now, please have a seat and pay careful attention.”

Then the manager called in Mohan had received the promotion and asked him to do the same job. He readily agreed and went to the store.

When he returned, the manager asked, “What kind of oranges did you buy?”

“Well,” Mohan replied, “the store had many varieties—there were navel oranges, Valencia oranges, Nagpur Oranges, Coorg Oranges and Darjeeling Oranges... apart from many others, and I didn’t know which kind to buy. But I remembered you said your wife needed the oranges, so I called her. She said she was having a party and that she was going to make orange juice. So I asked the grocer which of all these oranges would make the best orange juice. He said the Valencia orange was full of very sweet juice, so that’s what I bought. I dropped them by your home on my way back to the office. Your wife was very pleased.”

“How much did they cost?” the boss asked.

“Well, that was another problem. I didn’t know how many to buy, so I once again called your wife and asked her how many guests she was expecting. She said 20. I asked the grocer how many oranges would be needed to make juice for 20 people, and it was a lot. So, I asked the grocer if he could give me a quantity discount, and he did! These oranges normally cost 3 Rs, but I paid only 1 Rupee. Here is your change and the receipt after I purchased 80 oranges for making the juice needed for about 20 people.”

The boss smiled and said, “Thank you; you may go now Mohan.”

He looked over to Santhosh who had been watching. The young man stood up, slumped his shoulders, and said, “I see what you mean,” as he walked dejectedly out of the office.

What was the difference between Santhosh and Mohan? They were both asked to buy oranges, and they did. You might say that Mohan went the extra mile, or one was more efficient, or one paid more attention to detail. But the most important difference had to do with real intent and substantive output that was expected. Santhosh was a man motivated by money, position, and prestige. Mohan was driven by an intense desire to please his employer and an inner commitment to be the best employee he could possibly be—and the outcome was obvious.

As leaders and managers, it is important to ensure that people like Santhosh don't feel they are victims of the system. They do so because they have not understood the context in which they play. Managers can play their part by making people understand how they want them to go where they want them. This means clarifying goals, providing some agreed approaches, and providing interim feedback.

Often we hear that people feel the performance management system does not do a good job of making people understand why they are where they are. It is all about "clarifying the nature of intent" and making people understand the difference between the "content delivered" and "intent in what is being done" the difference between what is to be delivered and how it is to be delivered.

This means that you don't need to manage the work. you need to manage the understanding, ......the value of the intent, and............ the impact it has on the outcome delivered through the work. That will ensure employees get to feel the system is fair and would make attempts to design meaning in their work lives. Create Victors ... Not Victims.






Sunday, September 2, 2018

Food for Thought...

To Guess is Cheap, To Guess Wrong is Expensive !!!

We heard of the proverbial intuition in selecting people in our hiring / selection processes.   Haven't you heard about him / her who proudly proclaims.  "I have a gut feeling he would be a great fit.  I will select the candidate".

True, you have a gut feeling but when the choice of a wrong fit is more expensive than wrongly rejecting the right candidate you know which side it is better to err.   Some hiring decisions are for roles where the wrong person can make a huge impact negatively on the organization.  In such cases it is better to be more cautious.


Coupe of interesting one I came across (this is from Zig ZIglar)

Failure is an event, not a person !!

Often the event is missed out and the person bears the brunt of being typecast a failure.  This is short sighted.  In a process centric world today,  we look for six sigma levels of design and so if something fails it should be a mistake in the process maybe due to various reasons, lack of training, lack of awareness or simply oversight.   Thus it is important to distil out the real issue else we would only end up looking for a scapegoat, a name to fix or a head to roll.


Others can stop you temporarily, you are the only one who can do it permanently.

That is why they say today one has to constantly seek to realize one's potential.   Not be able to contribute on what you are capable of is something that causes inefficiency in any system and that is something we always need to look for so that we can achieve beyond what is expected or what we thought possible.


 Success comes when preparation meets opportunity.  

Something I always tell new folks who join my organization. In large organizations we have "Potential Opportunities" but unless one is ready for them prepares and spots them putting the effort it won't materialize.  Those who succeed are the one's who were well prepared and therefore identified, then delivered on the opportunity. 

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Welcome Chief Data Officer

According to a recent 2017 study report Data Never Sleeps. Think for a moment what happens in the digital world every 60 seconds...Twitteratti send over 450,000 tweets, Netflix Users stream over 69,000 hours of video, LinkedIn gets 120+ new users, 103 Million spam emails are sent and 15 million text messages get transmitted.  This shows the amount of data is booming like never before. The phenomenon is not just about the social world outside the organization's boundaries but also within. Almost every medium to large enterprise has an intranet, financial systems, social interaction system, employee self-service system, HRMS and also systems to log user digital actions 24x7.





All this means more active data, more archived information and more possible (Sic!!) insights pouring in from machines and the avalanche of data is becoming overwhelming and unusable and untapped for many organizations. The problem statement for the leadership is how to manage the vast data they possess, how to manage the use of data, data ethics and possibly derive tremendous value from the data or the insights that can be gained from that data. 

Make Way for The Chief Data Officer, CDO in short. These are the new kids on the block in the organizational hierarchies. However, by 2020 Gartner sees more than 90% of organizations will have a CDO on their payrolls. There are surely data managers and data scientists who are looking at data consistency, integrity and data access issues today but when you need to tie up the place of data in your company strategy, have to understand the competitive advantage that data brings, when you need to bring it up in your C-Suit discussions then the role has to scale up many notches to dwell on strategy, management of processes, ethics, security and so on. This led to emergence of the role of Chief Data Officers.

A CDO has several buckets of responsibilities in their portfolio where to go with the data, what to do and why do what you do with it, Also how to do and what not to do with the data.

Where and Why: It is all about the strategic focus. Data strategy helps to bring this direction. The quest is ... data could eventually be of value, should be secure and could serve as a competitive advantage. Data strategy is about deciding and framing policies, governance processes and clarity on how to manage the data through the organization. Boundary spanning rules and governance processes which means how data is treated within the organization as well as how customer and partner data is treated in a safe, secure and confidential manner. This set of where and why responsibilities are the most critical as every value creation and value leverage possibility that the data has and is not understood will lead to inefficiencies and potential loss of customer experience enhancement as well as loss of possible downstream growth and profitability enhancement. Data systems are no longer back end invisible IT systems that the old world paradigm understood. They are a critical strategic lever today

What and How: With strategy in place the CDO focuses on execution aspects of the strategic focus. Key would be to understand what kind of data will the organization capture and what purpose. The CDO and team also focus on how the manage the data with right set of processes and guidelines and channelize the way the data is generated, captured, stored, accessed and archived. The CDO organization guides the adoption of right tools and frameworks to ensure data integrity and also channelizes their right and effective use through various models of engaging among data processors, data valuators and data users.
There are huge sources of data today in many organizations and it is important to understand how to pull all this data from different sources and what data to process to what extent so that it can be used effectively for getting customer insights, business insights as well as market insights.


What Not To Do, Why Not To Do These span across the ethics and value system in handling the data. Integrity is a technical realm while ethics about use and handling of data is more in the values realm. Values Thinking is the new mantra when it comes to driving decisions around sharing of data, usage of data and access. Data privacy regulations and data governance are integral part of the role of the CDO. Data lying around insecurely is like your bank locker kept open when no ones around and you hoping no one will take what is in there. Assets get retired periodically and it is important to understand where and how to handle the data therein. In the past much of this data would get lost for ever in the maze of technological grass lands. Some organizations used to leverage the data they have collected by selling them outright and now the CDO's have to take a careful look as to whether such configurations are in conflict with national and regional compliance guidelines and within the legal framework.


SKILLS & CAPABILITIES LANDSCAPE
According to a 2017 study at University of Arkansas over two thirds of CDO's had at least one masters degree and about 16% of them had PhD Or Doctoral level degrees. About half were qualified in computer sciences, engineering or Information sciences while about a third were postgraduates in Business Management.

Data officers may start with about 10 years of expertise around the Role of the CDO would need a blend of business understanding, strategic thinking, and good understanding of technology. They should be good at the ability to influence and also drive change programs.

On the technical side, they will need strong design development and validation skills to work with applied analytics models including descriptive, predictive and prescriptive models. Collaboration, Interpersonal skills and Communication are three underlying factors that one would need to look for across the spectrum for the CDO role.

The CDO must also possess strong leadership, be able to move cross-functional groups in a unified direction as well as be able to move business executives and stakeholders.

It will be one of the key roles that we would continue to see emerging as the months go by and every mid and large size organization will have a Data Officer or a CDO organization in the years to come making it one of the new transitioning entities that will establish a firm foothold in the organizational landscape of tomorrow

READ ALSO


.

Saturday, July 7, 2018

More on Bystander Problem

Some years ago I wrote about the Bystander Problem in organizations. Read thatby clicking alongside.  CLICK HERE   

Even Ballu never broached the subject again and in a true bystander fashion we both let it go.   However let me try and elaborate a bit more on this topic that has been of interest to social researchers since 1970's.

In USA there was a very well publicized and documented murder of  a lady by name of Kitty Genovess on 13th March 1964.   She parked her car a small distance from her home and was approaching her home when she was attacked by a man Winston Moseley who chased her and stabbed her repeatedly as she screamed aloud for help. As many as 3 dozen neighbors watched from behind their windows and screens and ignored her call for help and never stepped out to save the lady.  She finally succumbed to her injuries.  


Psychologists John Darley and Bibb Latane, explored the issue of why witnesses of such drastic acts demonstrated a lack of response to help the victims and found that the bystander apathy is a major factor that influences helping behavior.  It refers to a phenomenon by which greater the number of people present who are witnessing a distress situation less likely is a person ready to help.   

When a distress situation occurs observes are more likely to take action if there are few or no other witnesses. 

Reaction time for someone to help is also higher when larger number of bystanders are present. 

The explanation of this is that when more number of people are present the responsibility gets diffused. Also people seem to imitate what they believe is socially acceptable ways and since others did not move forward to help each one was waiting to see whether others would act and no one acted.    Also when situation is ambiguous people tend to resist acting

In the organization contexts when people witness something going wrong and there are many other witnesses the same bystander phenomenon creeps in. Everyone is waiting for someone to act and each one thinks someone else will act and in the end no one acts.  Also the bystander effect is juxtaposed by the pretender phenomenon when every one believes that nothing went wrong and no one is to blame as the blame is spread thin over many bystanders and hence diluted and no one is guilty.

This phenomenon can be detrimental to organizations if it becomes recurrent, however one must use some deliberate strategies to overcome the same and we can discuss this in another blog. 

You can also read
Frame it for Success

Problem Elimination Not Problem Solving Should be the Focus



Blog Archive